Tag Archives: code

Talkin’ Code by Andrew Getty Webb Code Enforcement Officer

Design Criteria Index

Building Tip: Ask your designer to outline design criteria usedAll too often a set of construction plans are submitted without the basic information spelled out on the front page as to what the plan is for.

A title box showing the owner, what the plans represent and where the structure is intended to be located was not part of the first page.

The drawings may appear professionally prepared, may have some sort of seal from a design professional on them, but without sitting down to truly study the drawings it is impossible to know what the basic design criteria is and how that was derived.

Last week’s article in the Weekly Adirondack gave a brief explanation on the snow load design criteria for roof systems located around the state.

There is a huge difference from where the Town of Webb is located compared to New York City, or other areas around the state.

Snow load is only one of a number of basic design criteria that is imperative that the local Code Officer understand.

Every building, no matter what it is used for, larger than 144 square feet, must meet the minimum design criteria for the location in which it is built.

And for additions, alterations and renovations other design criteria notes may be required.

The architect or engineer for the project must know what the minimum design criteria is for the location that the structure will be built in.

Anyone can produce a generic plan showing the traditional framing techniques like 2 X 6 walls, 2 X 10 floor joists, a roof truss system, standard poured foundation and then simply put a note somewhere that everything must meet the local code requirements.

By law the local Code Officer cannot design the structure.

The Code Officer can help the designer with the minimum design criteria information, but the designer needs to have this basic information to start.

When a set of plans are submitted to the Code Office and a title block spelling out everything is right on the front sheet, plan review becomes much smoother.

Design criteria should include, but may not be limited to, what code was used for design, what year or edition of the code, wind zone, seismic zone, ground snow load zone and how that was calculated, climate zone for energy conservation, type of construction, use and occupancy classification, fire load or fire area, type of sprinkler system [if required] and weather exposure.

There is even a zone for termites.

When a Code Office receives a set of plans that has no title box, that is not signed by the design professional, has no indication as to how everything was designed, as to what code was used or what standards were intended, plan review just got a little more time consuming.

Although plans are reviewed, now the review must pull out all the information to verify that the minimum design criteria were met.

To verify roof ground snow load, you can usually go to the span tables and charts in the Building Code and see if the proposed roof plan meets the minimum requirements.

That works for any place in New York State except in ground snow load zones of 80 or more.

The chart stops at 70 maximum.

This is intended to force the Code Official to insist on an engineered roof system, showing any increase based on elevation.

This can also include any site specific loading needs based on historical information and experience.

Help yourself by insisting that your designer includes all the design criteria for your project, and is clearly shown on the front sheet.

This will definitely speed up the plan review process.

This is a good idea no matter where your project is, because none of this type of information is local zoning laws, it’s all about the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code.

 

Share Button

Talkin’ Code by Andrew Getty

Ground Snow Load – Roof Design

The Town of Webb Office of Code Enforcement tackles some frequently asked questions

Roof-load designs may need elevating in higher elevationsContractors, engineers, architects and code officers are all familiar with the concept of roof loads and design.

Ever since 2002, when the state entered into the family of the International Building Code (of New York), the design criteria is referred to the Ground Snow Load (GSL).

When a roof truss is designed, all sorts of potential conditions are considered.

Things like unbalanced snow accumulations (wind-blown clean on one side with six feet of snow on the opposite side), wind uplift and general wind conditions.

It’s not uncommon to receive a set of construction drawings showing the ground snow load design as 80 pounds per square foot.

That is what the Building Code of New York shows on the chart for this area.

However, unless you read the text and the fine print, all too often the designer misses the increased load requirements for areas having an elevation of greater than 1,000 feet above sea level.

Straight out of the code books:

1608.2 Ground snow loads.

The ground snow loads to be used in determining the design snow loads for roofs shall be determined in accordance with ASCE 7 or Figure 1608.2.

When using Figure 1608.2 for sites at elevations above 1,000 feet (304 m), the ground snow load shall be increased from the mapped value by 2 psf (0.095 kN/m2) for every 100 feet (30 480 mm) above 1,000 feet (304 m).

Site-specific case studies may be made in lieu of snow loads in Figure 1608.2 or ASCE 7.

Ground snow load determination for site-specific case studies shall be approved and shall be based on an extreme value statistical analysis of data available in the vicinity of the site using a value with a 2-percent annual probability of being exceeded (50-year mean recurrence interval).

Please SEE ABOVE MAP…

Most USGS maps will show the elevation of your site.

Today, many cars with navigation systems will also tell you the elevation as you’re driving along.

The Town of Webb varies from approximately 1,650 to as high as 2,200 above sea level.

That means the GSL design shall range from 93 to 104 psf.

Don’t forget, these are minimum standards; in some areas it may make sense to increase that because of known snow falls that never seem to get reported.

Now you know to remind your designer to make sure they have adjusted the design of the roof based on elevation.

 

Share Button

Talkin’ Code: Modular, Mobile, Stick Construction: A look at how each stacks up

by Andrew Getty Webb Code Enforcement Officer

Modular, Mobile, Stick

Similar to a conventional on-site stick built home, a modular home is also stick built.

Usually constructed in sections, inside a controlled factory type environment, modular homes are in every way basically the same as a stick built home.

Both meet the same NYS Residential Code requirements.

This includes, but is not limited to, structural design, roof loads, energy code, emergency rescue and escape windows, smoke alarms, CO alarms, hand railings and guards, stairs, foundations, plumbing, heating, electric or any other provision of the code.

The obvious difference is that the structure is not built on site. So who does all the various stages of inspections?  Continue reading

Share Button

TALKIN’ CODE: The Town of Webb Office of Code Enforcement tackles some frequently asked questions

By Andrew Getty

Working together to preserve our special small-town aesthetic

Last July 4th weekend was interesting to say the least. Here in the Code Office, complaints started flowing in on Wednesday the 29th of June—just before the rush of the weekend.

Not only was the office dealing with dozens of building permit applications (in anticipation of a long weekend), we were flooded with complaints about neighbors against neighbors.

All kinds of complaints; junk, tall grass, clotheslines, noise, parking of cars, boats blocking docks, trespassing, peeing over the edge of boats, campfires, hammering early in the morning, overcrowding of houses, unsafe rental units, sewage in basements at a business, and signs—oh boy, were there complaints about signs, especially through the business district in Old Forge. Continue reading

Share Button

Talkin’ Code with Andrew Getty

Dye Testing is Back: Important to support your lake association

The Town of Webb Office of Code Enforcement tackles some frequently asked questions

Protecting our waters

The annual dye testing program has started. Anyone who has owned water front property for a couple of years is familiar with the program.

Some property owners can remember the program back into the 1960’s… and that includes yours truly!

Not trying to divulge age, many fond memories were lodged in this old head, of my Dad and I going around Big Moose Lake and using a liquid dye and testing the septic systems of willing neighbors.

And in those early years dye was revealing contamination more often than one might think.

Recently, a test was completed on a camp on Fourth Lake. The owners can recall the ’60s and the whole reason for starting the testing program… there was substantial pollution of the lake, some of it floating visibly like little bogs or plumes with sludge and greasy looking yuk sticking to boats, docks, fish and yourself if you tried to swim or water ski.

Not a good visual, is it?

Back in those years many direct pipes to the lake were discovered. The more of these situations that were discovered the more awareness as to the issue.

And more awareness created more peer pressure to correct the problem.

If it was not for the foresight, efforts, time and expense incurred by the Fulton Chain of Lakes Property Owner’s Association and the Big Moose Lake Property Owner’s Association back in the 1960’s, the cleanliness of our waters may not be as good as it is today.

For almost fifty years both lake associations have been actively involved in hiring staff, overseeing the work and monitoring the results.

The program has always been supported by the town.

Through the years, as the program gained momentum and started to show results, the town’s role became clearer.

Now, for the past six years, the program is substantially administered through the Code Office.

This does not mean that the lake associations are out of the picture. Not at all!

They administer many other tests and projects that are beyond dye testing.

If it were not for the continued support and help of key members of the associations, the town could not do the program very effectively.

This support comes in the form of money & funding, helping to find staff, and some physical help by getting to some boat-access-only properties.

Dye testing is a small piece, in a huge puzzle, of an ongoing effort, by the lake associations and the town, to protect one of our most valuable natural resources…our lakes.

Some other issues that the associations deal with are invasive species (milfoil), water clarity, acid rain, water testing and lab work.

Dye testing clearly is not the only method to check a septic system.

There are way too many other variables that can impact the proper treatment of wastewater. The age and condition of septic tanks, proximity to ground water or the depth of bedrock and impervious soils are all contributing factors.

The depth of a drywell or a seepage pit usually is well into ground water… think about that for a minute. There should be a four foot separation minimally!

The program benefits everyone, whether you have waterfront property or not.

Have you considered joining your lake association and supporting the ongoing efforts to maintain the quality of water that you swim, ski, boat or otherwise enjoy?

You should.

 

Share Button

Talkin’ Code with Andrew Getty

Asked questions This last weekend Brooker Hardware & Lumber sponsored their third annual Home Show at the North Street Pavilion here in the Town of Webb.

And for the third time, the Town of Webb Code Enforcement Office, along with the Adirondack Park Agency (APA), was invited to have an informational booth.

Although we were not selling anything, plenty of zoning maps, district use charts and various information fliers seemed to disappear.

There were quite a few people that asked all sorts of different questions.

Some questions were specific to the Town of Webb and some directed to the Park Agency.

Either way, everyone believed that having the Code Office and the APA there, available to answer questions on Saturday or Sunday, was beneficial and helpful.

There were many questions regarding additions, especially additions to shoreline structures.

Other questions included new garages, sheds, and second story additions, docks, swimming rafts, boathouses, bunkhouses and new homes.

Those are fairly straight forward questions and easy to answer.

The more difficult questions were things like the neighbors’ junk yards, abandoned buildings, unsightly properties, noise complaints, illegal commercial activities and bothersome campfires (a subject of a recent article).

Grandfathering in all types of situations was another common question.

Grandfathering refers to “lawfully existing but nonconforming” building, lot or use of property.

Something had to built before Town zoning (1965) or before APA (1973) and never altered.

A nonconforming use had to be established before those same dates.

Typically nonconforming uses are restaurants or other commercial activities in residential zones that are prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance but have lawfully existed since before 1965.

Expansions, replacements or alterations of any kind to any type of grandfathered situation may be allowed but are subject to special approvals and due process locally known as Conditional Use Permits.

Although grandfathered situations are allowed to continue and be maintained, their replacement, expansion or repair is subject to review.

Comment by the public and approval (or denial) with potential conditions intended to help minimize any impacts the request may have on the surrounding neighborhood or the community in general.

During the Home Show many positive comments were made regarding this article.

People do read it and the awareness of the requirements has definitely increased.

Thanks to the support of The Weekly Adirondack this article provides one of many different ways of trying to let the world know about all the different rules and regulations that are out there.

And we all agree there are plenty of regulations.

Ultimately, it is the property owner’s responsibility to comply. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Contractors are as responsible as the property owner for compliance of any work they do.

Not just the general contractor, but anybody working on the property, which includes even the laborer, the delivery driver, any subcontractor, the job site supervisor… it does not mean just the general contractor.

Thanks again to Brooker Hardware & Lumber for the show. It is a lot of work to organize. It can benefit many people and businesses other than Brooker Hardware & Lumber.

Hopefully it benefits the property owner the most who is the actual consumer.

Maybe next year the Code Office along with the APA can stage a little show, with the help of some unsuspecting people.

Maybe something like the perfect application with a successful outcome, and then the complicated application with a more difficult result.

There have to be some people out there who would love to hammer the Code Office and the APA with some tough questions.

This could be fun and informative!!

 

Share Button

Talkin’ Code with Andrew Getty

Floor drains and oil separators: What’s required in your garage

The issue of whether or not the floor drain in your garage floor needs to be connected to an oil separator before being discharged to the ground has been a topic of discussion several times in the past couple of weeks.

This was being required some ten years ago in all garage floors; however, it has never been part of the Residential Code…

It has, however, always been part of the Building Code that applies to commercial uses.

Straight from the code pages, here are the two basic standards:

RESIDENTIAL CODE of New York:

R309.3 Floors.

Garage floors shall be of approved noncombustible material.

The area of floor used for parking of automobiles or other vehicles shall be sloped to facilitate the movement of liquids to a drain or toward the main vehicle entry doorway.

R309.4 Carports.

Carports shall be open on at least two sides. Carport floors shall be of approved noncombustible material.

Carports not open on at least two sides shall be considered a garage and shall comply with the provisions of this section for garages.

Exception: Asphalt surfaces shall be permitted at ground level in carports.

The area of floor used for parking of automobiles or other vehicles shall be sloped to facilitate the movement of liquids to a drain or toward the main vehicle entry doorway.

FIRE CODE of New York SECTION 2211 REPAIR GARAGES

2211.2.3 Drainage and disposal of liquids and oil-soaked waste.

Garage floor drains, where provided, shall drain to approved oil separators or traps discharging to a sewer in accordance with the Plumbing Code of New York State.

Contents of oil separators, traps and floor drainage systems shall be collected at sufficiently frequent intervals and removed from the premises to prevent oil from being carried into the sewers.

Continue reading

Share Button